The Nature of Transgression

Sanango Peruvian Amazon, Moyobamba

The motivations of our reactions and decisions are usually analyzed by us from the prospect of being subjects to the circumstances, in a world where we have been led to believe that what is happening almost entirely escapes our control and that we are puppets of gods and fate. Also those who believe that we are some sort of toys of Karma, already defined in previous lives. The first belief is in the collective unconscious from western culture, because “god father” is constantly intervening in their destiny and the second belief is a simplistic interpretation of karma, recreated primarily by those who take without interiorizing eastern concepts in the bazaar of the so called New Age.

The main characteristic of a transgression is that is an irresponsible reaction to a spiritual process, disguised as the circumstance that led to realize it. We must consider that a spiritual process is a process of change, a reconnection with ourselves and the divine. Is not a process of embarking on a belief, but rather to decode beliefs to understand the intelligence of the cosmos, get to understand ourselves and try to comprehend God. The spiritual process is a call to freedom. The transgression is a clinging to the belief and an attempt to give up what is leaving us without paradigms that could free us from ego.

The transgression or the attempt to renounce to freedom is valid considering the suffering that carries change, given that if we are in a real spiritual process, we are going to feel that we are dying and that everything that we took as truth becomes relative or simply does not exist anymore. The transgression is valid from the perspective of the ego trying to survive the “aggression” of awakening or starting to realize the truth of our inner capacity and true freedom through comprehension and divine intelligence. We must free ourselves to be subjects of circumstances, beliefs and dogmas. A spiritual process is to take responsibility for our actions, perceptions, circumstances and reactions. The transgression is precisely the irresponsibility of not taking action in our lives and undermining our own spiritual process, for then attributing to the “circumstance” our departure from the process.

To decode what we’ve crammed as truth for millennia requires a structure and technique. The difficult thing is to understand that decoding is not about having no structure, no ethics, seeing everything as relative and subject to be transgressed. Instead we need to take a structure to decode unnecessary information, understand that the universe has truth and fundamental laws that cannot be violated, that any process of inner change requires responsibility, love for what we are doing and be carried out by the truth we hear in our own hearts.

The transgression of these processes is not only a merely attempt of survival of the ego, is also a waiver of freedom and opportunity. Is clinging to our past and suffering, using it as a wildcard for being irresponsible with ourselves. In comprehension exercises of shamanism with intake of Ayahuasca and Master Plants, the transgression of the work to fallow to awaken within, the transgression of the tools, the misuse of mantras and master plants is exactly turning our backs to our healing process. Is giving for granted the love and compassion delivered by the entities that laid truth in our path not yet revealed for all humanity through the shamans or spiritual guides, truth that was granted to us for the privilege to free ourselves and others.

The greater the opportunity and comprehension is, the more irresponsible is for us and humanity to transgress it. The more we are given, the higher the resignation becomes, losing the opportunity to awaken our hearts through divine intelligence and access true freedom.

3 Responses to “The Nature of Transgression”

  1. Sofie says:

    Ole1 Nepf4 tudo bem,Bom quero sim aprofundar eu estou com upejormto para iniciae7e3o cientedfica ainda estou me graduando em filosofia 2ba peredodo ainda e sou graduado em sistemas de informae7e3o, ente3o para ne3o perder a computae7e3o je1 que estou mudando de e1rea resolvi estudar a filosfia da informae7e3o, e tive um plim interessante, com toda essa modernidade e todo mundo pensando em um des-humanizae7e3o das relae7f5es atrave9s da tecnologia, porque ne3o pensar de forma contre1ria?? Ente3o passei a estudar o que realmente era o virtual na filosofia, com Pierre Levy, Luciano Floridi e mais um que ainda ne3o me lembro o nome, ente3o pensei se he1 o virtual e o real separados eles se3o subjetivos mas, o que e9 subjetivo tem um esseancia, ente3o a teoria das formas de plate3o poderia me ajudar a rever o conceito de virtual e real pensando na informe1tica. Ente3o fae7o comparae7f5es como: Prae7as e centro de conviveancias X Redes Sociais; Quadros X Imagens digitais (Fotomontagens, layouts de sites e etc, aqui uso um pouco da fenomenologia de Merleau-Ponty); Comunicae7f5es diversas X Comunicae7e3o inste2ntanea e afins. Quando eu falo de empedrico eu chamo de empedrico o que os olhos, ou seja, o sentido da vise3o ilhe de1 como real e, quando eu digo que ela sempre sere1 A INTERNET digo que independentemente de como as pessoas pensem a internet em toda a sua subjetividade ela tere1 sempre algo que a fae7a o que ela e9, tere1 sempre sua via de acesso e seus cf3digos espalhados pela rede a disposie7e3o de ve1rias pessoas.Gostaria sim de aprofundar no caso ate9 pedir umas indicae7f5es de leitura sobre ontologia e antropologia que eu consiga associar no meu estudo pois ainda ne3o achei muita coisa interessante nestes aspectos. Fiquei curioso, pois he1 uma linha na filosofia que acredita que he1 algo fora do ser humano e outra que acredita que esse fora por ser intoce1vel sempre sere1 subjetivo. > bom existem as duas pore9m seguindo os filf3sofos que estou estudando a subjetividade ainda e9 um pouco prejorativa, como plate3o e sf3crates que atacam amargamente os sofistas e, entre outros a subjetividade e9 vaga. Pode sim ser subjetivo dependendo da forma de pensar de cada um pore9m ela tem um conceito e este conceito na mais e9 do que a imagem que vocea tem de algo vinculada ao seu uso e este e9 o mesmo para todos, eu penso em uma cadeira assim como vc pensa, pode ne3o ser a mesma cadeira azeul e acolchoada que pensei agora mas a cadeira laranja e de ple1stico continua sendo cadeira e tenhoo mesmo conceito da citada anteriormente, sendo assim, a subjetividade ne3o completa a coisa. Essa linha de reflexe3o e9 que eu tenho quando penso em A INTERNET .Ainda escrevo um pouco de forma confusa mas espero que entenda o que quero dizer, sere1 de grande valia as discussf5es e as trocas de e-mail se possedvel com vc Nepf4, achei que nem fosse obeter resposta hahahah abrae7os e paz .

  2. Nozomi says:

    This post was so inspiring, and furehtrmore coming at a time when direction is in short supply. Recently my thirst for life and exploration has been rekindled and stories like this only reassure me that finding my own path is the only way to truly exist in this world. Thank you for your post. It is people like you that shine the light to guide the way of others, so that they may also one day lead the way

  3. Hassan says:

    c9 impressionante como a falta de cocminuae7e3o passa pelo ego solto. As vezes brinco que ninguem se entende, que todo mundo sf3 fala e ouve o que quer, e ne3o importa o meio (fala, escrita, etc). Je1 vi tantas vezes alguem dizer verde e o outro entender azul. O mais legal e9 qdo se de1 esta relae7e3o afetiva-cognitiva, ou seja, mesmo que a pessoa diga a cor errada o outro entende a cor que ele quis dizer. ne3o importa o que foi dito ou escrito mas o que foi percebido por afeto e cognie7e3o.Em sintonia fina uma realidade ou parte dela pode ser vivenciada em grupo. sere1?

Leave a Comment








Blog

Subscribe to our Newsletter